Cases Citing ILEP Articles
ILEP’s mission has been to generate academic scholarship to help guide courts in securities fraud, consumer protection, and class action related matters. The success of that mission is reflected in the number of courts which have cited ILEP articles in their decisions.
United States Supreme Court
James D. Cox, Understanding Causation in Private Securities Lawsuits: Building on Amgen, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1719 (2013):
Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2398 (2014)
Donald C. Langevoort, Basic at Twenty: Rethinking Fraud on the Market, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 151:
Amgen Inc. v. Conn. Ret. Plans & Tr. Funds, 568 U.S. 455 (2013)
Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2398 (2014)
Stephen J. Choi & Linda J. Silberman, Transnational Litigation and Global Securities Class-Action Lawsuits, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 465:
Morrison v. Nat’l Austl. Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010)
Ronald M. Levin, “Vacation” at Sea: Judicial Remedies and Equitable Discretion in Administrative Law, 53 Duke L.J. 291 (2003):
Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 561 U.S. 139 (2010)
Burt Neuborne, Preliminary Reflections on Aspects of Holocaust-Era Litigation in American Courts, 80 Wash. U. L. Q. 795 (2002):
Am. Ins. Ass’n v. Garamendi, 539 U.S. 396 (2003)
United States Courts of Appeals
Issac J.K. Adams, The Scope of Substantive Due Process Rights of Parents of Adult Children, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1883 (2004):
Robertson v. Hecksel, 420 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2005)
Lucian Arye Bebchuk, The Questionable Case for Using Auctions to Select Lead Counsel, 80 Wash. U. L.Q. 889 (2002):
In re Synthroid Mktg. Litig., 325 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2003)
Alon Brav & J.B. Heaton, Event Studies in Securities Litigation: Low Power, Confounding Effects, and Bias, 93 Wash. U. L. Rev. 583 (2015):
Petrobras Sec. Univs. Superannuation Scheme Ltd. v. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras, 862 F.3d 250 (2d Cir. 2017)
Esther Bruegger & Frederick C. Dunbar, Estimating Financial Fraud Damages with Response Coefficients, 35 J. Corp. L. 11 (2009):
Glickenhaus & Co. v. Household Int’l, Inc., 787 F.3d 408 (7th Cir. 2015)
Stephen Calkins, Perspectives on State and Federal Antitrust Enforcement, 53 Duke L.J. 673 (2003):
AT&T Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., 707 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013)
Paul D. Carrington & Derek P. Apanovitch, The Constitutional Limits of Judicial Rulemaking: The Illegitimacy of Mass-Tort Settlements Negotiated Under Federal Rule 23, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 461 (1997)
In re Prudential Ins. Co. Am. Sales Practice Litig. Agent Actions, 148 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 1998)
Sullivan v. DB Invs., Inc., 667 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 2011)
John C. Coffee, Jr., Reforming the Securities Class Action: An Essay on Deterrence and Its Implementation, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1534 (2006):
In re Boston Sci. Corp. Sec. Litig., 686 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2012)
James D. Cox & John W. Payne, Mutual Fund Expense Disclosures: A Behavioral Perspective, 83 Wash. U.L.Q. 907 (2005):
Jones v. Harris Assocs. L.P., 537 F.3d 728 (7th Cir. 2008)
James D. Cox & Randall S. Thomas, Does the Plaintiff Matter? An Empirical Analysis of Lead Plaintiffs in Securities Class Actions, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1587 (2006):
Dekalb Cnty. Pension Fund v. Transocean Ltd., 817 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2016)
Frederick C. Dunbar, Estimating Financial Fraud Damages with Response Coefficients, 35 J. Corp. L. 11 (2009):
Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int’l Pension Fund v. Credit Suisse Sec. (USA) LLC, 752 F.3d 82 (1st Cir. 2014)
Frederick C. Dunbar & Arun Sen, Counterfactual Keys to Causation and Damages in Shareholder Class-Action Lawsuits, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 199:
Glickenhaus & Co. v. Household Int’l, Inc., 787 F.3d 408 (7th Cir. 2015)
In re Pfizer Inc. Sec. Litig., 819 F.3d 642 (2d Cir. 2015)
Theodore Eisenberg & Geoffrey Miller, The Role of Opt-Outs and Objectors in Class Action Litigation: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1529 (2004):
Eubank v. Pella Corp., 753 F.3d 718 (7th Cir. 2014)
Brian T. Fitzpatrick, Do Class Action Lawyers Make Too Little?, 158 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2043 (2010):
Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 822 F.3d 269 (6th Cir. 2016)
Beth S. Frank, Note, Protecting the Privacy of Sexual Harassment Plaintiffs: The Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege and Recovery of Emotional Distress Damages Under the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 79 Wash. U. L.Q. 639 (2001):
Doe v. Oberweis Dairy, 456 F.3d 704 (7th Cir. 2006)
Michael H. Gottesman, From Barefoot to Daubert to Joiner: Triple Play or Double Error, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 753 (1998):
Flores v. Johnson, 210 F.3d 456 (5th Cir. 2000)
Lyman Johnson, A Fresh Look at Director “Independence”: Mutual Fund Fee Litigation and Gartenberg at Twenty-Five, 61 Vand. L. Rev. 497 (2008):
Gallus v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc., 561 F.3d 816 (8th Cir. 2009)
Robert H. Klonoff, The Decline of Class Actions, 90 Wash. U. L. Rev. 729 (2013):
Eubank v. Pella Corp., 753 F.3d 718 (7th Cir. 2014)
In re Johnson, 760 F.3d 66 (D.C. Cir. 2014)
In re NFL Players Concussion Injury Litig., 775 F.3d 570 (3d Cir. 2014)
David Hill Koysza, Note, Preventing Defendants from Mooting Class Actions by Picking Off Named Plaintiffs, 53 Duke L.J. 781 (2003):
Weiss v. Regal Collections, 385 F.3d 337 (3d Cir. 2004)
Donald C. Langevoort, Private Litigation to Enforce Fiduciary Duties in Mutual Funds: Derivative Suits, Disinterested Directors and the Ideology of Investor Sovereignty, 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 1017 (2005):
Gallus v. Ameriprise Fin., Inc., 561 F.3d 816 (8th Cir. 2009)
Donald C. Langevoort & G. Mitu Gulati, The Muddled Duty to Disclose Under Rule 10b-5, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1639 (2004):
SEC v. Rocklage, 470 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2006)
Stratte-Mcclure v. Morgan Stanley, 776 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2015)
Ronald M. Levin, “Vacation” at Sea: Judicial Remedies and Equitable Discretion in Administrative Law, 53 Duke L.J. 291 (2003):
Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 579 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009)
Heartland Reg’l Med. Ctr. v. Sebelius, 566 F.3d 193 (D.C. Cir. 2009)
Linda S. Mullenix, The Constitutionality of the Proposed Rule 23 Class Action Amendments, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 615 (1997):
In re Prudential Ins. Co. Am. Sales Practice Litig. Agent Actions, 148 F.3d 283 (3d Cir. 1998)
Burt Neuborne, Preliminary Reflections on Aspects of Holocaust-Era Litigation in American Courts, 80 Wash. U. L. Q. 795 (2002):
Alperin v. Vatican Bank, 410 F.3d 532 (9th Cir. 2005)
Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2003)
Jeffrey W. Stempel, Class Actions and Limited Vision: Opportunities for Improvement Through a More Functional Approach to Class Treatment of Disputes, 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 1127 (2005):
Thorogood v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008)
Thorogood v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 627 F.3d 289 (7th Cir. 2010)
Frank Torchio, Proper Event Study Analysis in Securities Litigation, 35 J. Corp. L. 159 (2009):
Hubbard v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., 688 F.3d 713 (11th Cir. 2012)
Neil Vidmar, The Performance of the American Civil Jury: An Empirical Perspective, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 849 (1998):
United States v. Hall, 165 F.3d 1095 (7th Cir. 1999)
Richard H. Walker & J. Gordon Seymour, Recent Judicial and Legislative Developments Affecting the Private Securities Fraud Class Action, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 1003 (1998):
In re Advanta Corp. Sec. Litig., 180 F.3d 525 (3d Cir. 1999)
In re Silicon Graphics Inc. Sec. Litig., 183 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 1999)
Stephen C. Yeazell, The Past and Future of Defendant and Settlement Classes in Collective Litigation, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 687 (1997):
Neale v. Volvo Cars of N. Am., LLC, 794 F.3d 353 (3d Cir. 2015)
United States District Courts
Michael Barclay & Frank C. Torchio, A Comparison of Trading Models Used for Calculating Aggregate Damages in Securities Litigation, 64 Law & Contemp. Prob. 105 (2001):
In re BearingPoint, Inc. Sec. Litig., 232 F.R.D. 534 (E.D. Va. 2006)
Alon Brav & J.B. Heaton, Event Studies in Securities Litigation: Low Power, Confounding Effects, and Bias, 93 Wash. U. L. Rev. 583 (2015):
Carpenters Pension Tr. Fund of St. Louis v. Barclays PLC, 310 F.R.D. 69 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) [Cited prior to publication in Wash. U. L. Rev.]
Strougo v. Barclays PLC, 312 F.R.D. 307 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) [Cited prior to publication in Wash. U. L. Rev.]
Stephen B. Burbank, Pleading and the Dilemmas of “General Rules,” 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 535:
Revolinski v. AMTRAK, No. 08-C-1098, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37830 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 16, 2010)
Paul D. Carrington & Derek P. Apanovitch, The Constitutional Limits of Judicial Rulemaking: The Illegitimacy of Mass-Tort Settlements Negotiated Under Federal Rule 23, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 461 (1997):
In re Relafen Antitrust Litig., 225 F.R.D. 14 (D. Mass. 2004)
Steven J. Choi, The Evidence on Securities Class Actions, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1465 (2004):
In re OCA, Inc. Sec. & Derivative Litig., No. 05-2165, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90854 (E.D. La. Dec. 14, 2006)
Stephen J. Choi & Robert B. Thompson, Changes During the First Decade After the PSLRA, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1489 (2006):
In re ViroPharma Inc. Sec. Litig., 21 F. Supp. 3d 458 (E.D. Pa. 2014)
John C. Coffee, Jr., Reforming the Securities Class Action: An Essay on Deterrence and Its Implementation, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1534 (2006):
In re Citigroup Inc. Sec. Litig., 965 F. Supp. 2d 369 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)
In re Credit Suisse-AOL Sec. Litig., 253 F.R.D. 17 (D. Mass. 2008)
In re Enron Corp. Sec., Derivative & “ERISA” Litig., 586 F. Supp. 2d 732 (S. D. Tex. 2008)
In re Intelligroup Sec. Litig., 527 F. Supp. 2d 262 (D.N.J. Nov. 13, 2007)
Lopez v. Youngblood, No. CV-F-07-0474 DLB, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99289 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 2, 2011)
[Cited pre-publication in Colum. L. Rev.]
Edward H. Cooper, The (Cloudy) Future of Class Actions, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 923 (1998):
Curtis-Bauer v. Morgan Stanley & Co., No. C 06-3903 TEH, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113798 (N.D. Cal. July 7, 2008)
Montelongo v. Hous. Auth. City of El Paso, No. EP-09-CV-388-KC, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71912 (W.D. Tex. July 16, 2010)
Sims v. Hous. Auth. City of El Paso, No. EP-10-CV-109-KC, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72879 (W.D. Tex. July 19, 2010)
James D. Cox, Making Securities Fraud Class Actions Virtuous, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 497 (1997):
In re Dreyfus Aggressive Growth Mut. Fund Litig., No. 98 cv 4318 (HB), 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8418 (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2001)
James D. Cox & John W. Payne, Mutual Fund Expense Disclosures: A Behavioral Perspective, 83 Wash. U.L.Q. 907 (2005):
In re Am. Mut. Funds Fee Litig., No. CV 04-5593 GAF (RNBx), 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120597 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2009)
James D. Cox & Randall S. Thomas, Does the Plaintiff Matter? An Empirical Analysis of Lead Plaintiffs in Securities Class Actions, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1587 (2006):
In re Adelphia Commc’ns Corp. Sec. & Derivative Litig., No. 03 MDL 1529 (LMM), 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67220 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 3, 2008)
In re Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. Forex Transactions Litig., 148 F. Supp. 3d 303 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2015)
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 51 Pension Fund v. Darden Rests., Inc., No. 08-cv-388-Orl-19DAB, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111155 (M.D. Fla. July 1, 2008)
James D. Cox & Randall S. Thomas, Leaving Money on the Table: Do Institutional Investors Fail to File Claims in Securities Class Actions?, 80 Wash. U. L.Q. 855 (2002):
In re Apollo Grp. Sec. Litig., No. 04-2147, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118775 (D. Ariz. Feb. 13, 2008)
Theodore Eisenberg & Geoffrey Miller, The Role of Opt-Outs and Objectors in Class Action Litigation: Theoretical and Empirical Issues, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1529 (2004):
Acosta v. Trans Union, LLC, 240 F.R.D. 564 (C.D. Cal. 2007)
Acosta v. Trans Union, LLC, 243 F.R.D. 377 (C.D. Cal. 2007)
In re Checking Account Overdraft Litig., 830 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (S.D. Fla. 2011)
In re Heartland Payment Sys., Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 851 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (S.D. Tex. 2012)
Turner v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., 472 F. Supp. 2d 830 (E.D. La. 2007)
Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc., 236 F.R.D. 485 (C.D. Cal. 2006)
Jill E. Fisch, Class Action Reform: Lessons from Securities Litigation, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 533 (1997):
In re Auction Houses Antitrust Litig., 197 F.R.D. 71 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
In re Baan Co. Sec. Litig., 186 F.R.D. 214 (D.D.C. 1999)
In re Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp. Sec. Litig., 3 F. Supp. 2d 1208 (D.N.M. 1998)
Brian T. Fitzpatrick, Do Class Action Lawyers Make Too Little?, 158 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2043 (2010):
In re Heartland Payment Sys., Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 851 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (S.D. Tex. 2012)
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litig., 135 F. Supp. 3d 679 (N.D. Ohio 2015)
In re Se. Milk Antitrust Litig., Nos. 07-CV 208, 08-MD-1000, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70167 (E.D. Tenn. May 17, 2013)
Beth S. Frank, Note, Protecting the Privacy of Sexual Harassment Plaintiffs: The Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege and Recovery of Emotional Distress Damages Under the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 79 Wash. U. L.Q. 639 (2001):
Taylor v. City of Chicago, No. 14 C 737, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133715 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 28, 2016)
Jack Greenberg, Civil Rights Class Actions: Procedural Means of Obtaining Substance, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 575 (1997):
D.S. v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., 255 F.R.D. 59 (E.D.N.Y. 2008)
Samuel Issacharoff, Settled Expectations in a World of Unsettled Law: Choice of Law After the Class Action Fairness Act, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1839 (2006):
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 315 F.R.D. 157 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)
Samuel Issacharoff & John Fabian Witt, The Inevitability of Aggregate Settlement: An Institutional Account of American Tort Law, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1571 (2004):
In re Armstrong World Indus., 348 B.R. 111 (D. Del. 2006)
In re Engle Cases, No. 09-cv-10000-WGY-JBT, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61486 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 21, 2015)
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 315 F.R.D. 157 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., No. CV-04-1945 (JBW), 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27469 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2005)
Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F. Supp. 2d 992 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)
In re Zyprexa Prods. Liab. Litig., 375 F. Supp. 2d 190 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)
Robert H. Klonoff, The Decline of Class Actions, 90 Wash. U. L. Rev. 729 (2013):
Dickens v. GC Servs. Ltd. P’ship, 220 F. Supp. 3d 1312 (M.D. Fla. 2016)
Dickens v. GC Servs. Ltd. P’ship, No. 16-cv-803-T-30TGW, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138278 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 5, 2016)
Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 315 F.R.D. 157 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)
LaRocque v. TRS Recovery Servs., 285 F.R.D. 139 (D. Maine 2012) [Cited pre-publication in Wash. U. L. Rev.]
David Hill Koysza, Note, Preventing Defendants from Mooting Class Actions by Picking Off Named Plaintiffs, 53 Duke L.J. 781 (2003):
Everett v. MCI, Inc., No. 05-2122-PHX-ROS, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71871 (D. Ariz. Sept. 9, 2006)
Donald C. Langevoort, Basic at Twenty: Rethinking Fraud on the Market, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 151:
Lenartz v. Am. Superconductor Corp., 879 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D. Mass. 2012)
Donald Langevoort, Reading Stoneridge Carefully: A Duty-Based Approach to Reliance and Third-Party Liability Under Rule 10b-5, 158 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2125 (2010):
Rabin v. Nasdaq Omx Phlx LLC, 182 F. Supp. 3d 220 (E.D. Pa. 2016)
Donald C. Langevoort & G. Mitu Gulati, The Muddled Duty to Disclose Under Rule 10b-5, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1639 (2004):
In re Thornburg Mortg., Inc. Sec. Litig., 695 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (D.N.M. 2010)
In re Thornburg Mortg., Inc. Sec. Litig., 824 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (D.N.M. 2011)
Ronald M. Levin, “Vacation” at Sea: Judicial Remedies and Equitable Discretion in Administrative Law, 53 Duke L.J. 291 (2003):
Ctr. for Native Ecosystems v. Salazar, 795 F. Supp. 2d 1236 (D. Colo. 2011)
High Country Conservation Advocates v. U.S. Forest Serv., 67 F. Supp. 3d 1262 (D. Colo. 2014)
NACS v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 958 F. Supp. 2d 85 (D.D.C. 2013)
Sierra Club v. Strock, 495 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Fla. 2007)
David Marcus, The History of the Modern Class Action, Part I: Sturm Und Drang, 1953-1980, 90 Wash. U. L. Rev. 587 (2013):
Bee, Denning, Inc. v. Capital Alliance Grp., 310 F.R.D. 614 (S.D. Cal. 2015)
Linda Mullenix, Taking Adequacy Seriously: The Inadequate Assessment of Adequacy in Litigation and Settlement Classes, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1687 (2004):
Curtis-Bauer v. Morgan Stanley & Co., No. C 06-3903 TEH, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113798 (N.D. Cal. July 7, 2008)
In re Kosmos Energy Ltd. Sec. Litig., 299 F.R.D. 133 (N.D. Tex. 2014)
McMorris v. TJX Cos., 493 F. Supp. 2d 158 (D. Mass. 2007)
In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litig., 296 F.R.D. 47 (D. Mass. 2013)
In re Relafen Antitrust Litig., 231 F.R.D. 52 (D. Mass. 2005)
Paul V. Niemeyer, Remarks to the Institute for Law and Economic Policy, 39 Ariz. L. Rev. 719 (1997):
Simon v. Philip Morris Inc., 200 F.R.D. 21 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)
Frank Partnoy, Barbarians at the Gatekeepers?: A Proposal for a Modified Strict Liability Regime, 79 Wash. U. L.Q. 491 (2001):
In re WorldCom, Inc. Sec. Litig., 346 F. Supp. 2d 628 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
Richard H. Walker & J. Gordon Seymour, Recent Judicial and Legislative Developments Affecting the Private Securities Fraud Class Action, 40 Ariz. L. Rev. 1003 (1998):
In re Credit Acceptance Corp. Sec. Litig., 50 F. Supp. 2d 662 (E.D. Mich. 1999)